4 C
Alba Iulia
Tuesday, July 7, 2020

SC affirms graft, malversation raps vs Napoles, 2 others over PDAF scam

Must Read

Manila ranks among world’s top emerging startup ecosystems

The Philippine startup ecosystem is once again featured in the annual Global Startup Ecosystem Report (GSER) by...

Pivoting back from a global pandemic

As I am writing this, I am sitting here in the quiet space of the kitchen. The...

Protecting the community from Coronavirus (COVID-19): information for Filipino-Australians

As we move towards living COVIDSafe, it is important that you stay home if you are unwell....

By Christopher Lloyd T. Caliwan

MANILA, Feb. 21 (PNA) — The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday junked the petition of Janet Lim Napoles and two others seeking to dismiss raps against them for violation of the Anti-Graft Law and malversation of public funds filed by the Office of the Ombudsman in connection to the alleged misuse of over PHP25-million Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) of former Agusan del Sur Representative Rodolfo Plaza.

”The Court dismissed the petitions for certiorari and upheld the issuance of the September 26, 2014 joint resolution and November 26, 2014 joint order,” SC spokesman Theodore Te said after the directive was issued following Tuesday’s regular en banc session of the magistrates.

In affirming the Ombudsman’s finding of probable cause, the high court reiterated its deference to the Ombudsman’s performance of its duty.

The SC added that there is no proof that the Ombudsman has abused its discretion in filing the case at the Sandiganbayan.

“Petitioners’ contentions that the absence of the elements of the crimes they were charged with is a matter of defense to be ventilated at the trial as these are evidentiary matters requiring a full-blown and not during preliminary investigation,” the high court said.

Aside from Napoles, the high court also dismissed the petition filed her driver John Raymund De Asis and National Agri-Business Corporation (NABCOR) President Alan Javellana.

The three are facing a case for malversation of public funds, corruption of public officials and violation of the Anti-Graft Law.

The Court also disagreed with the contentions of Napoles and De Asis that they could not be charged as they were private individuals and not public officers.

The Court pointed to the policy of the state, expressed in RA 3019 to repress acts of public officers and private individuals that constitute graft and corruption or may lead thereto.

Get more stories like this in your inbox!

Sign up for our newsletter and receive regular updates.

- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

We value your privacy. Your personal details will not be shared to third parties.

Latest News

Manila ranks among world’s top emerging startup ecosystems

The Philippine startup ecosystem is once again featured in the annual Global Startup Ecosystem Report (GSER) by...

Random Posts

Pacman excited to visit Australia, says promoter Maniatis

16 August 2015, Melbourne Australia- “Manny Pacquiao and wife Jinkee are both looking forward to seeing Australia and Manny is happy to see his...


By  DYMPHNA PINEDA As the sun transforms into a magnificent scintillation, And the seagull mourns the day's inexorable cessation, I wonder why everything passes and goes. From the zenith of the...

ADOLP to attend International Pilgrim Congress

NAGA CITY 16TH SEPT AND 17TH SEPT The Australian Devotees of Our Lady of Penafrancia has recevied an invitation from Archbishop Leonardo Legaspi to...

Knox Community Chess Enthusiasts celebrates Knox Seniors Festival

By Maina M Walkley In January 2018 I wrote an article Rediscovering the Joy of Chess and More on the Knox Community Chess Enthusiasts (KCCE) which...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -